1-8 Wrestling Wild Beasts at Ephesus / Making Sense of Life
In the context of talking about our hope of bodily
resurrection at Christ’s return, Paul says that this hope was what had given
perspective to his wrestling with wild beasts at Ephesus (1 Cor. 15:32). The
context surely requires that we understand this as referring to how he had been
in danger of losing his physical life because of this wrestling, but he endured
it with a mindset which looked ahead to the resurrection of the body. The
wrestling with wild beasts, therefore, appears to be a literal experience which
he had, rather than using ‘wrestling with wild beasts’ in a figurative sense.
There was at Ephesus an amphitheatre, and we also know that there were cases
where convicted criminals were forced to fight wild animals; if they killed the
animal, then they went free. It seems this is what happened to Paul. He speaks
in 2 Cor. 1:8-10 of an acute crisis which he faced in Asia (and Ephesus was in
Asia) which involved his having been given a death sentence, and yet being
saved out of it by “the God who raises the dead”. This emphasis on bodily
resurrection is the same context we have in 1 Cor. 15:32. As he faced his death
in 2 Tim. 4:17, Paul reminisced how the Lord had earlier saved him “out of the
mouth of the lion”; and the context there is of literal language, and we are
therefore inclined to consider that he was literally saved from a lion in the
arena at Ephesus. This also helps us better understand his earlier reference in
Corinthians to having been exhibited as a spectacle, as a gladiator at a show,
“appointed unto death”, in the presence of God and men (1 Cor. 4:9). Note that
despite this traumatic experience, Paul chose to continue at Ephesus even after
that, because he saw a door had been opened to him for the Gospel, despite
“many adversaries” (1 Cor. 16:8,9). We who are so shy to put a word in for the
Lord in our encounters with people ought to take strength from Paul’s dogged
example in Ephesus.
But when Paul speaks in 2 Cor. 1:8-10 of his death sentence
experience in Ephesus, he does so in the context of having reasoned in the
previous verses of how whatever we experience, we experience so that we may
comfort others: “[God] comforts us in all our affliction, so that we may be
able to comfort those who are in any affliction, with the comfort with which we
ourselves are comforted by God. For as we share abundantly in Christ's
sufferings, so in Christ we share abundantly in comfort too. If we are
afflicted, it is for your comfort and salvation; and if we are comforted, it is
for your comfort, which you experience when you patiently endure the same
sufferings that we suffer”. These verses are profound in their implication.
Whatever we experience is according to God’s plan, so that we might use that
experience in order to strengthen others. We all share in Christ’s afflictions,
but “in Christ” we experience comfort, insofar as others within the body of
Christ mediate His comfort to us. However, the whole process only functions if
we open ourselves up to others, understanding their experiences and sharing with
them the strength which we received when we went through the same things in
essence. No life is of course identical; few believers have experienced what
Paul did in Ephesus. And yet he says that he wanted to use that experience in
order to comfort those in Corinth who in essence were going through the same
thing. We live in an age where mankind is in retreat, retreat back into
himself. The online life tempts us to interact only as far as we wish and as
often as we wish, and this has led many to retreat into themselves. Likewise
interaction at meetings of the body of Christ can so often focus only around
surface level issues. We don’t expose ourselves, and others don’t expose
themselves to us. Within such a spirit of isolationism, we can never allow the body
of Christ to function as God intends. We will fail to find ultimate meaning in
our experiences; for Paul teaches clearly that they happen to us in order that
we may share the fruits of them with others. This is why so many alcoholics and
other addicts who do the 12 step courses tend to fail on the very last step-
that they hereafter vow to spend the rest of their lives sharing what they have
learnt with others. And so they retreat back into the mire of mediocrity and
into the old patterns of existence and coping.
This line of thought explains why within Biblical history, it’s
apparent that circumstances repeated in essence within the experience of God’s
children. Ezekiel was asked to eat unclean food by God, and he found it so hard
to get his legalistic head around it; Peter likewise. Jesus was led by the
Spirit into the wilderness and was tempted there for 40 days to reveal what was
in His heart- just as Israel had been for 40 years. It also explains why once
and if we can dig beneath the facade of normality which we all tend to cover
our faces with, we find there are others who have experienced amazingly similar
experiences to ourselves. And the extraordinary similarity of experience is in
fact designed by God; because these are
meetings and connections made in Heaven. We are here for each other, and all we
experience is in a sense for others. This opens another window onto the meaning
of personal suffering; another take on the eternal question “Why?”. There’s an
element to it which isn’t for our benefit at all, but for others. Take Job.
That man was “perfect” and solidly with the Lord at the start of the book, and
he is the same at the end of the book. The purpose of his sufferings was
perhaps not therefore simply for his own personal development; but for the
conversion of the three friends. The palsied man was palsied and was healed so
that others might learn that the Son of Man had power to forgive sins (Mt.
10:6-9).
We too easily assume that nobody else could ever understand our life path, the way we have taken. We too quickly consider that others have a charmed life. Some seem to have great health and family relationships, money, security and spirituality. But in fact beneath all that veneer there simply has to be in every life lived in Christ an awful co-suffering with Him. People in Christ go through the most awful, unspeakable agonies. Every one of us does. Nobody gets off light. It just seems to our limited vision that some do. We all wrestle with wild beasts at Ephesus, and are saved out of the mouth of the lion. Whatever the Corinthians were enduring, it was in essence “the same suffering” as Paul endured in that arena. And there should therefore have been a meeting of minds; the basis of our fellowship is largely intended to be our common experience in Christ. Ideas and theories tend to divide; experience unites. And what people need far more than anything else, than any smart expositions or mental gymnastics with Scripture, more than money, is the simple comfort of Christ’s love. We have each received that comfort ourselves in our life experiences; and we are to make the functioning of Christ’s body effective by getting out there and sharing that comfort with others. For this is how, mechanically as it were, on the ground, in reality, “we [who] share abundantly in Christ's sufferings, in Christ share abundantly in comfort too”.