18-4 The Jesus-Mary Magdalene Relationship
Mary’s Response To Jesus
The smell of Mary’s ointment “filled the house” (Jn. 12:3). Yet every
one of the 11 OT references to a house being filled refers to the temple
being filled with the Shekinah glory (1 Kings 8:10,11; 2 Chron. 5:13,14;
7:1,2; Is. 6:4; Ez. 10:3,4; 43:5; 44:4). John’s sensitive use of language
is surely seeking to draw a parallel. She was glorifying the Name by her
gift, senseless as it may have seemed in the eyes of less spiritual people.
There is a definite connection between spikenard and what incense was
made from. What may seem to have no practical achievement in the eyes
of men can truly be a sweet smelling savour to God. We need to remember
this at times in bearing with our brethren’s efforts for Him. To judge
them in a utilitarian way is to fall into the same error as the disciples
did. The efforts of others are described later in the NT in the same language-
the same word for “odour” occurs in Phil. 4:18 to describe the labour
of believers which is “wellpleasing to God”. The way Mary anoints the
Lord with spikenard is surely to be connected with how earlier she had
washed His feet with her tears. The spikenard was “precious” (Jn. 12:3
RV), not only in its value materially, but in the way Mary used it in
some kind of parallel to her tears. She perceived the preciousness of
her tears, her repentance, her grateful love for her Lord. And any tears
we may shed in gratitude of forgiveness are likewise so precious in His
sight
The question arises as to why Mary anointed the Lord’s feet, when anointing
is nearly always of the head. The only time the foot of anything was anointed
was in Ex. 40:11, when the pedestal / “foot” of the laver was anointed
in order to consecrate it. This pedestal was made from the brass mirrors
donated by repentant prostitutes (Ex. 38:8 = 1 Sam. 2:22). In this there
is the connection. Mary the repentant whore wanted to likewise donate
way she had to the true tabernacle and laver, which she perceived to be
the Lord Jesus. Her equivalent of brass mirrors was her pound of spikenard.
And it could be that she had been baptized at her conversion, and saw
the Lord as her laver. And this was her response- to pour all her wealth
into Him. She anointed him for His death- for she perceived that it was
through death that the Lord would fulfill all the OT types of the laver
etc.
“Let her alone” translated a Greek phrase which essentially means ‘to
forgive’, and it is usually translated like this. The Lord isn’t just
saying ‘leave off her, let her be as she is’; He is saying ‘Let her be
forgiven’, which is tantamount to saying ‘let her express her gratitude
as she wants’. The root for her gratitude was her sense of forgiveness.
This heightens the connection between Mary and the woman in the city who
was a sinner of Lk. 7.
Mary anointed the Lord’s head (Mt. 26:6) in order to reflect her belief
that He really was the Christ, the anointed one. She gave her life savings
for this belief. It can be apparently painless to believe that Jesus is
Christ, and yet the implications of accepting this simple fact can transform
a life. What she did was surely rooted in her understanding of Song 1:12,
where Solomon’s lover has spikenard (s.w. LXX Jn. 12:3) which sends forth
its smell “While the king sitteth at his table”. Clearly enough she saw
Jesus right there and then as the King- even though His Kingdom was not
of that world. Her love for Him, her reflection upon the Old Testament,
and her perception of Him as her future Lord and King to the extent that
she even then treated Him as such, so certain was her faith in His future
victory and worthiness…this all motivated her to give the quintessence
of her life’s work for Him. And it should for us too.
The similarities between the anointing record in Lk. 7 and those
of Jn. 12 etc. require an explanation. Could it not be that the
Gospels are showing us that the intensity of Mary’s faith and love
at first conversion was held by her until the end of the Lord’s
ministry? We need to ask ourselves whether the fire of first love
for Him has grown weak; whether over the years we would do the same
things for Him, feel the same way about Him, cry the same tears
over Him…or have the years worn our idealism away?
Martha was “anxious and troubled about many things” (Lk. 10:42 RV), but
the Lord perceived that Mary was anxious and troubled about the “one thing”
that was “needful”- and the context demands we understand this “one thing”
as hearing the Lord’s words. For her, as she sat there at His feet, it
was an anxious and troubling experience. To hear the Lord’s words is in
this sense a troubling experience. Whilst we are saved by grace, the extent
of the imperative within the Lord’s teaching is without doubt ‘troubling’
to the sensitive believer in Him. For we cannot hear Him without perceiving
the enormous imperative which there is within those words for the transformation
of our human lives in practice.
It can be that we take the exhortation to “be careful for nothing” as
meaning that we are intended to live a care-free life. But the sentence
goes on: “but in every thing by prayer and supplication with thanksgiving
let your requests be made known to God”, and a few verses later we read
of how the Philippians were “careful” to support Paul’s ministry in practice
(Phil. 4:6,10). The idea is surely that we should have no anxiety or care
about the things of this life- and the world in which we live is increasingly
preoccupied with the daily issues of existence. The same Greek word for
“careful” or “anxious” (RV) is repeatedly used by the Lord in the context
of saying we should not be anxious (Mt. 6:25,27,28,31,34)- but
rather, we should be anxious to serve and hear the Lord in practice. We
must “be careful to maintain good works” (Tit. 3:8), “care for one another”
(1 Cor. 12:25), “care” for the state of others (Phil. 2:20). So the NT
teaching is that we should not have the anxious care about our daily existence
which characterizes the world, but rather, should translate that into
a life of anxiety for others.
The one thing that was needful is surely to be connected by the incident,
also recorded by Luke, where the Lord tells the rich young man that he
lacks “the one thing” (Lk. 18:22)- which in his case, was to give his
wealth away. Yet Mary did this, when she poured out her life savings on
the Lord’s feet. Sitting at His feet, hearing His words, led her to anoint
those feet. She chose “the one thing”, of anxiously hearing His words,
the lines in her forehead showing in intense concentration. And yet that
learning of Him issued in something practical- she gave her life to Him
in practice, by giving all she had to those feet. The rich young man lacked
the one thing- for he was not then ready to give his life’s wealth to
the Lord. Moving the spotlight onto ourselves, we can hear, and yet do
nothing. We can read our Bibles without the intensity of devotion which
Mary had, and without there being any direct translation of what we hear
and read into practice. We can be as the rich young man, intellectually
impressed, and yet totally failing to accept the tremendous practical
demands behind the most simple, basic teachings of the Lord.
Mary came seeking the Lord early in the morning…and this inevitably takes
our minds to some OT passages which speak of doing just this:
- “O God, thou art my God; early will I seek thee: my
soul thirsteth for thee, my flesh longeth for thee in a dry and thirsty
land, where no water is; To see thy power and thy glory”
(Ps. 63:1,2). The resurrection of Jesus showed clearly both the power
(2 Cor. 13:4) and glory (Rom. 6:4) of the Father. For Mary, life without
her Lord was a dry and thirsty land. This was why she went to the grave
early that morning. She was simply aching for Him. And she had well
learnt the Lord’s teaching, that her brother’s resurrection had been
associated with the glory of the Father (Jn. 11:40). She went early
to the tomb to seek the Father’s glory- so the allusion to Ps. 63 implies.
She was the one person who had actually believed in advance the Lord’s
teaching about resurrection. And yet even she was confused- half her
brain perceived it all and believed it, and was rewarded by being the
first to see the risen Lord; and yet another part of her brain was simply
overcome with grief, believing that the gardener had somehow removed
the body some place else. And our own highest heights of spiritual perception
are likewise shrouded by such humanity too.
- “I love them that love me; and those that seek me early shall find
me” (Prov. 8:17) is written in the first instance of wisdom. And yet
the Lord Jesus has “wisdom” as one of His titles (Mt. 12:42; 1 Cor.
1:24,30). Mary sat at the Lord’s feet to hear His wisdom; to her, she
showed in practice what it means to comprehend Jesus as “the wisdom
of God”. She anxiously heard His words. And thus she sought Him early…because
she so wanted to hear His wisdom again. Of course, she loved Him. But
that love was rooted in respect and almost an addiction to His wisdom.
It was this that she loved about Him, and it was this which led her
to the grave early. And it was this which led her to the honour of being
the first to see the risen Jesus.
- “Yea, in the way of thy judgments, O LORD, have we waited for thee;
the desire of our soul is to thy name, and to the
remembrance of thee. With my soul have I desired thee in the night;
yea, with my spirit within me will I seek thee early” (Is. 26:8,9) makes
the same connection between seeking the Lord early, and loving His words.
Jewish women were not supposed to talk to men in public. The fact that
Mary addresses the man whom she thinks of as “the gardener” shows how
her love for Jesus, her search for Him, led her to break out of gender
roles. She perceived that through His death, there was now neither male
nor female, but a new kind of family (Jn. 20:14,15).
Jesus’ Response To Mary
Mk. 14:9 could mean that when the Gospel message is proclaimed in all
the world at Messiah’s return, then what Mary had done would be told [before
God] that He may mercifully remember her for good at the judgment. This
may sound a forced interpretation to Western ears and eyes, but we must
remember that the idea of ‘for a memorial’ denoted being spoken of for
good before someone, in this case, the judge of all. What follows from
this is that there will be a direct link between our deeds today, and
the judgment process of tomorrow [or later today]. What we have done will
be told before God, and He will remember us for good. On one hand, works
are irrelevant. We are saved by grace. On the other hand, there will be
a certain ‘going through’ of our deeds before Him. Quite simply, there
is a direct link between our behaviour and our future judgment. Nothing
will in that sense be forgotten.
Jn. 11:6 records that “therefore”- because Jesus loved Martha & Mary,
therefore He cured Lazarus. Spirituality can affect third parties; in
this case, Lazarus was raised because of Martha and Mary’s faith. And
so it can be that our prayers and intercessions for others can bring about
some degree of salvation for them which otherwise wouldn’t happen.
The Lord makes a clear allusion to Ps. 23 in saying that Mary had
anointed His head with oil, and His feet with ointment (Lk. 7:46). There,
it is God who is said to have anointed David's head, and prepared
a feast in the presence of his enemies (Ps. 23:5). The historical background
for this Psalm is when David fled from Absalom, and God manifested
in Barzillai prepared an unexpected feast for him, just the other side
of the valley from where his enemies were. Perhaps Barzillai also
anointed David's head with oil at the time. It seems the Lord saw God
as now manifest in Mary-He, through her, anointed His head with oil. And
she did it at a time when the Lord was sitting at a great feast. It could
logically follow that it was likewise Mary who had prepared the feast
for Him. And if, as we have suggested, Simon the Pharisee was her brother
or father or relative, then this would make sense. The whole thing surely
has the ring of truth about it. Thus the Lord saw God as personally manifested
through ex-hooker Mary. This should quieten all our doubts as to whether
God really could be manifested through such as us. And note that Mary
would have been the one who did the cooking.
Martha later complained that Mary didn't pull her weight in this department.
But the Lord replied that Mary had chosen between two 'parts' or options,
the cooking and hearing His word. It was a conscious choice. It wasn't
simply that she was a day dreamer or not domestically inclined. She could
and had prepared a meal. But she consciously chose to not max out on doing
work for the Lord, but on sitting still and hearing His words. We all
have the Martha tendency to focus on works; and the point is, Mary could
cook. It wasn't that she was incapable. But, she chose not to, to resign
her possibility to justify herself by works in order to listen. "
Stand still and see the mighty works of God" was Moses' appeal to
Israel, and God's to Job. We like them need to suffer the same word of
exhortation. |