4-1-2 Moses And " The reproach of Christ"
At age 40, Moses came to a crisis. He had a choice
between the riches of Egypt, the pleasures of sin for a season, and
choosing rather to suffer affliction with God's people and thereby
fellowship the reproach of Christ (Heb. 11:24-26). He probably had the
chance to become the next Pharaoh, as the son of Pharaoh's daughter;
but he consciously refused this, as a pure act of the will, as an
expression of faith in the future recompense of the Kingdom. There are
a number of passages which invite us to follow Moses' example in
this. We will see below that Paul was motivated in his rejection of
worldly advantage by Moses' inspiration. And as in all things, he
is our example, that we might follow Christ, who also turned down the
very real possibility of temporal rulership of the world- for the sake
of living the life of the cross, and thereby securing our
redemption.
Even within Hebrews, the description of Moses' rejection
of Egypt for the sake of Christ is shown to be our example: " Esteeming
the reproach of Christ greater riches than the treasures
(i.e. Pharaoh's treasures, which he could have had if he succeeded as
Pharaoh) in Egypt...let us go forth therefore unto (Jesus) without the
camp, bearing his reproach" (Heb. 11:26; 13:13). We should be
even eager to bear 'reproach for the name of Christ' as Moses did (1
Pet. 4:14), knowing it is a surety of our sharing his resurrection.
For Moses, " the reproach of Christ" was his
having " respect unto the recompense of the reward" . He therefore must
have understood in some detail that there would be a future Saviour,
who would enable the eternal Kingdom promised to Abraham through his
bearing the reproach of this world. Such was Moses' appreciation
of this that it motivated him to reject Egypt. His motivation,
therefore, was based upon a fine reflection upon the promises to
Abraham and other oblique prophecies of the suffering Messiah contained
in the book of Genesis. Moses knew he could have a share in the
sufferings of the future saviour and thereby share his reward, because
he saw the implication that Messiah would be our representative. Yet
those promises are the very things which Christians now say they are
bored of hearing every few weeks on a Sunday evening. No wonder we lack
Moses' desire to share Christ's reproach, and thereby reject the
attractions of this world. The way Moses had " respect unto the
recompense of the reward" is our example; for again, even within
Hebrews, we are exhorted: " Cast not away therefore your confidence,
which hath great recompense of reward" (Heb. 11:26; 10:35).
The Greek for " respect" means to look away from all else; indicating
how single-mindedly and intensely did Moses look ahead to the Kingdom;
the knowledge of which was, in terms of number of words, scant indeed.
All he had was the covenants of promise.
It is worth trying to visualize the scene when Moses was
“full forty years old” (Acts 7:23). It would make a fine
movie. The Greek phrase could refer to Moses’ birthday, and one
is tempted to speculate that it had been arranged that when Moses was
40, he would become Pharaoh. Heb. 11:24 says that he refused and chose-
the Greek tense implying a one off choice- to suffer affliction with
God’s people. It is tempting to imagine Moses at the ceremony
when he should have been declared as Pharaoh, the most powerful man in
his world…standing up and saying, to a suddenly hushed audience,
voice cracking with shame and stress and yet some sort of proud relief
that he was doing the right thing: “I, whom you know in Egyptian
as Meses, am Moshe, yes, Moshe the Jew; and I decline to be
Pharaoh”. Imagine his foster mother’s pain and anger. And
then in the end, the wonderful honour would have been given to another
man, who became Pharaoh. Perhaps he or his son was the one to whom
Moses was to come, 40 years later. After a nervous breakdown,
stuttering, speaking with a thick accent, clearly having forgotten
Egyptian… walking through the mansions of glory, along the
corridors of power, to meet that man, to whom he had given the throne
40 years earlier.
" The reproach of Christ"
Paul " counted" the things of this life as loss " for
the excellency of the knowledge of Christ" and his sufferings (Phil.
3:8), so that he would gain the resurrection. Moses likewise rejected
the world for the same two reasons: the excellency of sharing the
reproach of Christ, and secondly from respect unto the recompense of
the reward, at the resurrection. He uses the same word translated "
esteemed" when we read of how Moses " esteemed" the reproach of Christ
as greater riches than the treasures in Egypt (Heb. 11:26). The "
reproach" of Christ is the same word used concerning Christ being "
reviled" on the cross. Paul felt that the intellectual heights of
knowing the mind of our crucified Lord, of being able to enter into the
riches than are even now in the mind of Christ (Col. 2:3) more than
compensated for his sacrifice of all material things in this life. And
Moses was the same; he esteemed the " reproach of Christ" , the
knowledge that he was sharing the sufferings of his future saviour and
would thereby enter the Kingdom which he would make possible, as far
far greater than the possibility of being King of Egypt. He knew that
he was sharing the sufferings of Christ, and that therefore he would be
rewarded. It was this knowledge which motivated him in rejecting the
riches of Egypt.
And Moses really is our example- as is Paul. It is
tempting to think that intellectual appreciation cannot affect our
practical lives. But once we start to sense that we really are touching
minds with the Lord Jesus, that our sufferings are really making us one
with the mind / spirit of Christ in Heaven, then this alone will make
our material position in this life utterly meaningless. We will easily
reject demanding jobs, larger houses, the security of savings- because
of the sheer wonder of our knowledge of Christ and our fellowship with
him. For many, this idea will be pushed off as altogether too
theoretical, too abstract. And yet for a minority of brethren and
sisters, the truth of all this has been realised in practice, year
after year. The teaching of these passages, the examples of Paul and
Moses, really are there to be copied. They are not just sweet stories
to be admired, as pictures, for their beauty in themselves. There is a
dynamism within them, an ability to enter and change our lives- if we
are willing. Moses really is our example; he went through the
pain of rejecting his mother, the shame of the poor intellectual
falling in love with the shepherd girl, the agony of divorce from her
later, the bitter loneliness of the wilderness years and apparent
rejection by God for the sake of those he loved... We tend to ask for
the pain to be taken away as soon as we have it, and I suppose it's
natural that we should ask the Father for such things. But through much
tribulation we enter the Kingdom.
Moses forsook the possibilities of Egypt not just for "
the reproach of Christ" ; he was also motivated by the fact that " he
endured (Gk. was vigorous), as seeing him who is invisible" (Heb.
11:27). It was as if he had seen the invisible God, as he
later asked to. When the disciples asked to see God, Christ said that
the manifestation of His character which they had seen in him was the
same thing (Jn. 14:8). Our experience of seeing the glory of God in the
face of Jesus Christ, with unveiled face like Moses, ought to be a wondrous
experience. When Moses asked to physically see God, the Angel
proclaimed the characteristics of God before him. So when we read of
Moses as it were seeing God at the time he decided to forsake
Egypt, this must mean that he so appreciated God's Name and character,
he so had faith in the future Kingdom which this great Name and
character promise, that he left Egypt. The Lord Jesus fed for strength
on the majesty of the Name of Yahweh (Mic. 5:4). Therefore
an appreciation of the Name of Yahweh is what will motivate us to
forsake the attractions of this temporal world. This does not mean, of
course, that simply pronouncing than Name in our prayers and readings
is enough. We must develop an appreciation of God's righteousness, so
that we read of His demonstration of grace, of mercy, of truth,
of judgement for sin, and love it, revel in it, respect it. As Paul
says, if we behold the glory of the Lord as Moses did, we will by that
very fact be changed into the same image of that glory (2 Cor. 3:18).
Yet such an appreciation needs constant feeding and development. It is
tragic, absolutely tragic, that over the next 40 years Moses lost this
height of appreciation, until at the burning bush he seems to have
almost completely lost his appreciation of the Name. Whatever spiritual
heights we may reach is no guarantee that we must inevitably stay
there. The history of our community is littered with many fine brethren
who fell from such heights of spirituality.
" (Moses) refused to be called the son of Pharaoh's
daughter; having chosen rather (Gk.) to suffer affliction
with the people of God" (Heb. 11:24,25) suggests that there was a
struggle within the mind of Moses, between the reproach of Christ and
the approbation of this world, and he then decisively came down on the
right side. If we are truly saints, called out ones after the pattern
of Moses, this struggle between present worldly advantage and the hope
of the Kingdom must surely be seen in our minds. For this reason Moses
is held up so highly as our example and pattern. He " forsook" Egypt
uses the same word translated " leaving" when we read of a man leaving
his parents to be joined to a wife, or of the shepherd leaving the 99
sheep to find the lost one.
Bithiah The Great
One important method in Bible study is
to keep asking
questions as we read a text, and to imagine how the story developed
further.
The account of Moses being found by Pharaoh’s daughter is a
classic Bible
story- but it begs many questions. Why did this young woman risk
disobeying her
father? Given Moses’ age, how did she manage to survive in
Pharaoh’s court with
an adopted child who looked like a Hebrew and ought to have been killed
in
babyhood? What kind of relationship did she have with her father? Did
he
tolerate her sympathy and “compassion” for the Hebrews?
Where else do we read about
Pharaoh’s daughter? Searching
through the Bible, perhaps with the help of a concordance, we come to
the
references to Solomon marrying Pharaoh’s daughter. No great
answers there to
our questions. Sometimes in Bible study we do draw a blank. And
that’s a blank.
And there’s only one other reference to Pharaoh’s daughter,
hidden away in the
obscure genealogies of Chronicles, which we likely skip reading in our
daily
Bible readings. But there… is the answer. “The sons of Ezrah:
Jether, Mered, Epher, and
Jalon. These are the sons of Bithiah, the daughter of Pharaoh, whom
Mered
married; and she conceived and bore Miriam, Shammai, and Ishbah, the
father of
Eshtemoa” (1 Chron. 4:17 ESV). Who was Mered? A prince of the
tribe of Judah.
And yes, he lived around the time of Moses. So… a daughter of
Pharaoh married a
Hebrew. A slave. And she was the daughter of Pharaoh. Now we’re
onto something.
We eagerly look up the meaning
of “Bithiah”. And we find that Bithiah
means ‘daughter of Yah’- there is an intended tension
therefore in the way in
which she is called ‘Bithiah the daughter of Pharaoh’,
especially considering
that Pharaoh was thought to be God in Egyptian culture. It cannot be an
undersigned
coincidence that Bithiah is recorded as having a daughter, whom she
called
Miriam. It’s
not very common for the names of daughters to be recorded in the
genealogies,
so it seems a point is being made. Miriam was of course the name of
Moses’
sister, who had first introduced Bithiah to Moses’ family. Her
name in Hebrew
is almost the feminine form of her father’s name, Mered. Mered
had another wife
who was from the tribe of Judah: “And his Judahite wife bore
Jered … Heber… and
Jekuthiel” (1 Chron. 4:18 ESV).
And then we wonder: Am I the first guy
to have come to this
discovery? This is where the internet is useful. A bit of research
shows that
no, others have figured some of this out. Not that getting support from
others
ultimately matters, for we should be ready to stand with our backs to
the world
if necessary in believing what we have discovered in the Bible. And no
jewel
shines so brightly as the one you find yourself, as Harry Tennant once
put it
in talking about Bible study. But all the same, it’s some level
of human
comfort to find we’re not completely alone, and in this case, to
find that
indeed Jewish tradition upholds this connection between Bithiah and the
adoptive mother of Moses. And Egyptologists have various theories as to
who the
Pharaoh of the Exodus was. One of them is that it was Amunhotep II. His
coffin
decorations appear to show that he had a skin condition- perhaps the
boils from
the plagues? One
stele
that was discovered shows that two of Amunhotep II's sons have been
"erased". Perhaps one of them was Moses?
It
seems likely that many Egyptians became
proselytes, because many of them left Egypt with Israel. So Bithiah
became
attracted to God’s people, and decided to forego all she
could’ve had in order
to save just one Hebrew life. If nothing else we learn that to
sacrifice all
for the sake of the salvation of ‘just’ one person is
perhaps what we are called
to. The woman who could’ve been one of the most powerful women in
the world
sacrificed it all, to marry a Hebrew slave- who already had a wife. And
presumably she changed her name. She was Yah’s daughter now, and
not that of ‘god’
Pharaoh. What motivated her? Surely her experience with raising Moses.
From the
mouth of a child, who may well have been with his Godly parents for up
to five
years, she learnt more of Yahweh’s ways. And she must’ve
got to know the family
of origin and been impressed by Moses’ big sister Miriam…
for she named her own
daughter after her.
But
the chain of influence didn’t end there.
For when Moses was 40, he did the same as what his adoptive mother did.
At age
40, Moses came to a crisis. He had a choice between the riches of
Egypt, the
pleasures of sin for a season, and choosing rather to suffer affliction
with
God's people and thereby fellowship the reproach of Christ (Heb.
11:24-26). He
probably had the chance to become the next Pharaoh, as the son of
Pharaoh's
daughter; but he consciously refused this, as an expression of faith in
the
future recompense of the Kingdom. Bithiah’s example
would’ve been ever before
him.
It
is worth trying to visualize the scene
when Moses was “full forty years old” (Acts 7:23). It would
make a fine movie.
The Greek phrase could refer to Moses’ birthday, and one is
tempted to
speculate that it had been arranged that when Moses was 40, he would
become
Pharaoh. Heb. 11:24 says that he refused and chose- the Greek tense
implying a
one off choice- to suffer affliction with God’s people. It is
tempting to
imagine Moses at the ceremony when he should have been declared as
Pharaoh, the
most powerful man in his world…standing up and saying, to a
suddenly hushed
audience, voice cracking with shame and stress and yet some sort of
proud
relief that he was doing the right thing: “I, whom you know in
Egyptian as Meses,
am Moshe, yes, Moshe the Hebrew; and I decline to be Pharaoh”. In
the end, the
wonderful honour would have been given to another man, who became
Pharaoh.
Perhaps he or his son was the one to whom Moses was to come, 40 years
later.
After a nervous breakdown, stuttering, speaking with a thick accent,
clearly
having forgotten Egyptian… walking through the mansions of
glory, along the
corridors of power, to meet that man, to whom he had given the throne
40 years
earlier.
And
the path of influence continued to Paul. Paul
"counted" the things of this life as loss "for the excellency of
the knowledge of Christ" and his sufferings (Phil. 3:8), so that he
would
gain the resurrection. Moses likewise rejected the world for the same
two
reasons: the excellency of sharing the reproach of Christ, and secondly
from
respect unto the recompense of the reward, at the resurrection. He uses
the
same word translated "esteemed" when we read of how Moses
"esteemed" the reproach of Christ as greater riches than the treasures
in Egypt (Heb. 11:26).
There
are a number of passages which invite
us to follow Moses' example in this, so that the path of influence goes
yet
further. Even within Hebrews, the description of Moses' rejection of
Egypt for
the sake of Christ is shown to be our example: " Esteeming the reproach
of
Christ greater riches than the treasures (i.e. Pharaoh's treasures,
which he
could have had if he succeeded as Pharaoh) in Egypt... let us go forth
therefore unto (Jesus) without the camp, bearing his reproach" (Heb.
11:26; 13:13). We should be even eager to bear 'reproach for the name
of
Christ' as Moses did (1 Pet. 4:14), knowing it is a surety of our
sharing his
resurrection. The way Moses had "respect unto the recompense of the
reward" is our example; for again, even within Hebrews, we are
exhorted:
"Cast not away therefore your confidence, which hath great recompense
of
reward" (Heb. 11:26; 10:35). The Greek for " respect" means to
look away from all else; indicating how single-mindedly and intensely
did Moses
look ahead to the Kingdom; the knowledge of which was, in terms of
number of
words, scant indeed. All he had was the covenants of promise.
"(Moses)
refused to be called the son of
Pharaoh's daughter; having chosen rather (Gk.) to suffer affliction
with the
people of God" (Heb. 11:24,25) suggests that there was a struggle
within
the mind of Moses, between the reproach of Christ and the approbation
of this
world, and he then decisively came down on the right side. If we are
truly
saints, called out ones after the pattern of Moses, this struggle
between
present worldly advantage and the hope of the Kingdom must surely be
seen in
our minds. For this reason Moses is held up so highly as our example
and
pattern.
We
too face choices. To take a second job,
rise early and stay up late… to advance in our careers. To get
more income, to
dispose of upon expensive coffees, the latest gadgets. Or in the spirit
of
Bithiah and Moses to realize, and realize finally and once for all,
that
nothing else matters now. The hope of the Kingdom and fellowship of the
rejected Son of God is worth so infinitely more than any of
Egypt’s temporary
glory. Moses rejected it for the sake of his service of God’s
people- who for
the most part never appreciated him, and turned their backs on
“this Moses”. Bithiah
likewise, gave it all up… just to be identified with God’s
people. Being the
second woman in Mered’s life, a Gentile compared to the other
wife being a true
blue blooded Judahite, couldn’t have been much fun. For all we
know, Bithiah
died alone and feeling rejected in the corner of a Hebrew slave camp,
lamenting
how Moses was apparently caught up in the good life of Pharaoh’s
court which
she had given up, buried in the hot sand without a grave, a far cry
from the
glory girl of her teens. But she did it all so as to be connected with
God’s
people, just as Moses chose to suffer affliction with a people of God
who didn’t
want him. There are brethren who set us a great example in these
things. They
lost their families because they married a believer and not the one
expected
for them. Married someone of another race or colour because of their
spiritual
connection with that person, thus losing the status they might have had
within
their own culture. They declined promotion in their career
because… they wanted
to get home each day in time to read Bible stories to their kids.
Didn’t take
out a court case but suffered the loss of so much, didn’t answer
slander, left
God to judge… Spent their spare time and cash going to the Post
Office and
mailing Bibles to people rather than… tropical beach holidays.
Spent their
evenings emailing or visiting old, sick, suffering, depressed,
difficult or plain
awkward brethren… instead of watching telly.
The
chain of influence ran from little Moses and
Miriam to Bithiah and then back to Moses, through Paul to us today. Our
examples
have far more power than we ever imagine. Over some issues and at some
times,
we like Bithiah and Moses must stand with our backs to the world.
Despised by
the world and even by the brotherhood, but so be it. We shall spend
eternity
day and night serving God… and it would be strange indeed if our
lives now were
not likewise totally dedicated to the things of the Kingdom into which
and for
which we were baptized.
|