6-2-3 Jonathan's Relationship With Saul
All of us in Christ experience a massive sense of paradox. We live
and work in this world, doing the things of this world in our daily
occupations, yet in the more important side of our lives we have
this high spiritual relationship with the Lord Jesus and the Almighty
Sovereign of this universe. This is - or ought to be- part of our
hour by hour experience in this life. A little imagination of Jonathan's
situation soon shows that our dilemma was exactly matched by his
experience. He was the King's son, heavily taken up with the day
to day running of the Kingdom, clearly tipped to succeed the King,
and possibly take over as regent on Saul's retirement. Saul effectively
says as much during his explosion at Jonathan for befriending David
(20:30,31). . So there was Jonathan, going up the ladder towards
Kingship, when he had no real interest in this, and when he had
firmly decided that David would be king, not himself , when the
Kingdom was established (23:17). There must be hundreds of Christians-cum-high
flying executives worldwide who can identify completely with this
scenario.
The bitterness underlying Saul's words in 20:30,31 indicates a
certain element of love-hate in Jonathan's relationship with Saul.
We can sense this in the record of 1 Sam.14, when Jonathan overcame
the Philistine garrison whilst his father cowered away in nervous
faithlessness. How jealous Saul must have been! Jealousy was one
of Saul's characteristics (1),
and it is subconsciously a major feature of the world's aggression
towards us; for the world is passively aggressive
(cp. Gen.3:15), if only we manifest Christ as we should. Saul almost
seems to have contrived his command not to eat on pain of death
in order to incriminate his son, whom he knew would not have heard
his prohibition. The way in which he says that even if it were Jonathan
who had eaten, then he must die (14:39), seems to suggest that Saul
was actually looking for an excuse to kill Jonathan. This love-hate
relationship between Jonathan and Saul is exactly typical of ours
with the world and our own flesh.
There were times when Jonathan's relationship with Saul and the
court became more strained than at others. Their all consuming desire
was increasingly the destruction of David. Our surrounding world
has a similar, obsessive, anti-Christ enthusiasm to which we are
diametrically opposed. It would seem that Saul's whole family turned
against David. A comparison of 1 Chron.10:6 and 1 Sam.31:6 shows
a parallel between the house of Saul and his men; and it was the
men of Saul who aided Saul in persecuting David (23:25,26). Further
divergence between David and Saul's family is shown by the fact
that Michal, Saul's daughter, either left David or was divorced
by him (2 Sam.2:2 cp. 6:20). Yet despite this, Jonathan's
intensity of relationship with David meant that he was not ashamed
to speak up for him: " Jonathan spake good of David unto Saul
his father, and said unto him, Let not the king sin
against his servant...because his works have been to thee-ward very
good: for he...slew the Philistine" (19:4,5). Note how he calls
Saul " the King" , suggesting a certain detachment from
him. The vision of David standing triumphant over Goliath still
motivated Jonathan, to the extent that he could stand up in that
hostile environment and testify to the love of David, the extent
of his selfless victory, and the urgent need for this to be recognized
by men. The spirit of our preaching only occasionally matches this
example. No wonder the record stresses Jonathan as being typical
of ourselves.
Despite this, the record reveals a certain closeness between Saul
and Jonathan in Jonathan's relationship with Saul. David recognized
this when he reflected that even in their death they were not divided
(2 Sam.1:23). Perhaps this means that they died fighting next to
each other. Consider the following:
- The description of Jonathan as the son of Saul occurs a massive
23 times; the connection between them is certainly highlighted.
- We have mentioned that Jonathan had Gideon as his personal
hero. Yet there is ample evidence that Saul too saw Gideon in
this light (2).
Does this suggest that in his more spiritual days, Saul successfully
imparted his spiritual enthusiasm for Gideon to his son in Sunday
school lessons?
- Mephibosheth is called Saul's son (2 Sam.9:7,10; 19:24), although
he was actually Jonathan's son. This suggests that the son was
brought up in Saul's house. This certainly does not give the impression
that Jonathan separated himself from his father's house.
- Jonathan was commander of the army (13:2). When he gave "
the robe that was upon him" to David (18:4),
he was effectively making David the commander (cp. 2 Chron.18:9,29).
Thus when " Saul set (David) over the men of war" (18:5),
he was tacitly going along with Jonathan's wish, even though by
this time he had already heard the women praising David more than
himself, and his bitter jealousy against David had already begun
(18:6). This little point simply shows the external unity of action
between Saul and Jonathan.
This closeness in Jonathan's relationship with Saul shows the emotional
tangle which Jonathan was in on account of his relationship with
David. If we truly love Christ, and if we are honest enough to come
to terms with the pull of our own natures, we will be going through
exactly the same. Our Lord seems to have seen in Jonathan a type
of ourselves. In the context of warning us that loyalty to him would
mean confessing him before men and conflict between fathers and
sons, he encourages us that not a hair of our head will perish (Mt.10:30
cp. Lk.21:18). This is picking up the application of this phrase
to Jonathan in 14:45.
Notes
(1) Saul's jealousy is most clearly
shown by his resentment of how the women praised David more than
himself. But consider too how Saul gave David his armour, as did
Jonathan (" garments" in 18:4 is the same word as "
armour" in 17:38). David accepted Jonathan's gift, but rejected
Saul's.
(2) The following is the evidence
that Saul saw Gideon as his spiritual hero: 1 Sam.11:11 = Jud.7:16;
13:5 = Jud.7:12; 13:6 = Gideon offering before fighting Midian;
14:5,20 = Jud.7:22; 14:24 = imitating Gideon and his men going without
food; 14:28,31 = Jud.8:4,5; 11:7 = Gideon killing his father's oxen. |