15-6 The Twelve Disciples As Children
      Yet the Lord was so positive about those dear men. A nice picture of 
        the Lord's perception of the disciples is found in the way He said that 
        the little boy who came to Him, responding to His call (Mt. 18:2) represented 
        the " little ones" who believed in Him (Mt. 18:6). 'Little ones' 
        is a title of the disciples in Zech. 13:7; Mt. 18:3; Jn. 21:5; and it 
        is disciples not literal children who have Angels in Heaven (Mt. 18:10). 
        The context in Mt. 18:11,12 speaks of the spiritually weak, implying the 
        'little ones' were spiritually little as well. Christ's talking to them 
        while he knew they were asleep in Gethsemane and the gentle " sleep 
        on now" , spoken to them whilst they were asleep (Mk. 14:41,42), 
        sounds as if He was consciously treating them as children- especially 
        fitting, given their spiritually low state then. His father-like care 
        for them is seen also in His promise in Jn. 14:18 RVmg. that He would 
        not leave them “orphans”, but He would come to them. The disciples were 
        not orphans- because they had a true and real Father-figure, in the Lord 
        Jesus. But the disciples were the Lord's children. John records in his 
        Gospel only once how Jesus described His disciples at the Passover meal 
        as “My little children” (Jn. 13:33). The Lord Jesus was acting as the 
        father of the family, instructing his children as to meaning of the Passover. 
        But the same phrase occurs seven times in 1 John. He had dwelt upon that 
        phrase of the Lord’s, and it clearly came to mean so much to him. Our 
        child-father relationship with the Lord Jesus likewise needs sustained 
        meditation. In this sense, the Lord Jesus was manifesting the Father, 
        and thus leading the disciples to the Father through Him.   
      Yet despite this discouragement, our Lord overcame by the totality of 
        His personal dedication to the goal ahead of Him. His commitment ultimately 
        did not depend upon the inspiration of His fellows, and His endurance 
        of the loneliness of the cross is the supreme example to us in this.   
       
      The infinite encouragement to us in our weakness is that Christ derived 
        such comfort and strength from men of such limited spiritual perception.  
        His fondness for them is indicated by the tears of Mary moving him to 
        weep too (Jn. 11:33). And an essay in unquestioning loyalty to the Lord 
        and Master is found in Lk. 22:49: " When they which were about him 
        saw what would follow (i.e. arrest and attack), they said unto him, Lord, 
        shall we smite with the sword?" . That grim faced band of men standing 
        in a protective circle  around their Lord knew that they had no chance 
        of victory against the mob with Judas, armed to the teeth as they were. 
        Yet they were willing, to a man, to heroically sacrifice their lives- 
        the inevitable result of starting a fight- as a token of loyalty to a 
        man who humanly speaking was a lost cause, and whose demise seemed so 
        unexpected to them compared to their hopes of a glorious Kingdom being 
        established there and then.   
      Christ's love for us, His Father's spiritual house, was typified by His 
        being likened to  the poor slave under the Law who perpetually dedicated 
        himself to serve his master's house. An extension of this idea is revealed 
        by a connection between the Lord saying " Ye have the poor always 
        with you; but me ye have not always" (Mt. 26:11) and Dt. 15:11 " 
        For the poor shall never cease out of the land" . Thus Jesus is associating 
        himself with the " poor man...of thy brethren" of Dt. 15:7. 
        Note how Jesus calls himself a " poor man" , especially on the 
        cross: Ps. 34:6; 35:10; 37:14; 40:17; 69:29,33; 70:5; 86:1; 109:22; 113:7 
        cp. 2 Cor. 8:9- an impressive list. Christ exercised the rights of the 
        poor to glean in the cornfield on the Sabbath (Lk. 6:1); Dt. 15:7 warned 
        the Israelites not to be hard hearted and refuse help to such a poor brother. 
        Christ is alluding to this passage by saying that the disciples should 
        not be hard hearted by stopping Mary give her rich ointment to Him, the 
        poor. The following Dt. 15:12-17 is also concerning Jesus. Thus Jesus 
        was spiritually poor and hungry, and was so grateful for Mary's encouragement. 
        The command to " open thine hand wide" unto the poor brother 
        (Dt. 15:8) is possibly picked up in Mt. 25:35-37, where Jesus tells the 
        unworthy that when He was poor, hungry and naked they did not feed Him. 
        Apart from referring to His manifestation in his poor brethren, it is 
        quite likely that he was referring to a sense of spiritual poverty / need 
        in His life, which apparently needed His followers to help. If He could 
        derive help from the disciples with all their limitations, surely He can 
        see the travail of His soul in us and be satisfied, or encouraged (Is. 
        53:11,12).   
      The Lord’s Patience
      The Lord’s patience with the disciples as children, His awareness of 
        their limitations, His gentleness, His changing of His expectations of 
        them according to their weaknesses, all provides powerful comfort to the 
        latter day disciple. So many times He didn’t correct their evidently wrong 
        ideas, as one doesn't with children, but patiently worked with them to 
        bring them to truth. His approach to demons is the most common single 
        example. When He had them go with Him unto Lazarus, they mistakenly thought 
        He meant ‘let us go and die too’ (Jn. 11:12-16)- and yet He graciously 
        didn’t correct them, but let events take their course. And we can take 
        a lesson from this, in how we relate to others we may see to be ‘in error’. 
        It’s not really about direct confrontation, which ends up proving us right 
        and them wrong, without actually bringing them to a personal conviction 
        of the truth in question.   
      Put together the following passages: 
      
        - The disciples’ return to Galilee after the resurrection was 
          a result of their lack of faith (Jn. 16:31,32) 
        - But the Lord went before them, as a shepherd goes before His 
          sheep, into Galilee (Mt. 28:7). Even in their weakness of faith, He 
          was still their shepherd, they were still His sheep, and He led them 
          even then. 
        - The Lord told them to go to Galilee (Mt. 28:10). He accepted 
          their lower level of faith. And He worked through that and led them 
          through it.   
       
      The return to Galilee is seen in an even worse light once we reflect 
        on the circumstances surrounding the first calling of the disciples, nearly 
        four years earlier. John’s Gospel implies that they were called at Bethany; 
        whereas the other Gospels say they were called whilst fishing at the sea 
        of Galilee. This is usually, and correctly, harmonized by concluding that 
        they were called as John says in Bethany, but they then returned to their 
        fishing in Galilee, and the Lord went there to call them again. So returning 
        to their fishing in Galilee had already been shown to them as being a 
        running away from the call of their Lord. And yet still they did it. And 
        yet John’s inspired record is so positive; he speaks as if the disciples 
        were called at Bethany and unwaveringly responded immediately. The point 
        that they actually lost their intensity and returned home is gently omitted 
        from specific mention. And even then, He saw them as more ‘converted’ 
        than they were. He had asked them earlier to be converted and become as 
        children (Mt. 18:3); but there by the lakeside, where they were still 
        not believing nor understanding properly, He calls out to them with the 
        very same Greek word: “Children, have ye any meat?” (Jn. 21:5). Considering 
        that they were not literally children, this was a strange and purposeful 
        form of address to them. Although they still hadn’t fully converted, the 
        Lord counted them as if they had. And likewise He counts us as more spiritually 
        developed than we are; and bids us do the same in our relations with His 
        brethren. Indeed it seems to me that when John in his letters addresses 
        the believers as “little children” (1 Jn. 2:13,18), he may not necessarily 
        have in mind young people or immature believers, but may simply be using 
        the form of address which he had recorded Jesus using- for all believers. 
       
      The disciples are described as sleeping for sorrow, not believing for 
        joy (Lk. 24:41). Both their unbelief and their sorrow and failure to support 
        the Lord in His time of need are not really excusable by either sorrow 
        nor joy. And yet the Lord generously imputes these excuses to His men, 
        such is His love for them. They are described as being “glad” when they 
        saw the risen Lord (Jn. 20:20). Yet actually they didn’t believe at that 
        time- for Lk. 24:41 generously says that they “believed not for joy”. 
        And they assumed that Jesus was a phantom, not the actual, concrete, bodily 
        Jesus. Placing the records together doesn’t give a very positive image 
        of the disciples at this time. And yet the record is so positive about 
        them. The confused women are commended by the Angels for ‘seeking the 
        Lord’ (Mt. 28:5)- even though that seeking was deep in their subconscious. 
        Yet the record notices that even incipient faith and understanding in 
        those women, and counts it to them. Would that we would be so generous 
        in our perception of others. Indeed, the generosity of the Father and 
        Son to humanity is awesome- so eager are they for our repentance. God 
        so pleads for Israel to return to Him in Hosea and Isaiah that He almost 
        takes the blame onto Himself, cooing over His people as having been tossed 
        and afflicted- when it was His own judgment of them that caused it. And 
        I think this explains the difficulty of Acts 3:17-19, where Peter appeals 
        to the Jews to repent, because they had murdered the Lord Jesus " 
        in ignorance" . The Lord's own parables explained that they did what 
        they did with open eyes- " this is the heir, come let us kill him!" 
        . Yet in God's passionate desire for their repentance, He appears to view 
        their awful sin in the most gracious possible light.   |