6-2-3 Jonathan's Relationship With Saul
            All of us in Christ experience a massive sense of paradox. We live 
              and work in this world, doing the things of this world in our daily 
              occupations, yet in the more important side of our lives we have 
              this high spiritual relationship with the Lord Jesus and the Almighty 
              Sovereign of this universe. This is - or ought to be- part of our 
              hour by hour experience in this life. A little imagination of Jonathan's 
              situation soon shows that our dilemma was exactly matched by his 
              experience. He was the King's son, heavily taken up with the day 
              to day running of the Kingdom, clearly tipped to succeed the King, 
              and possibly take over as regent on Saul's retirement. Saul effectively 
              says as much during his explosion at Jonathan for befriending David 
              (20:30,31). . So there was Jonathan, going up the ladder towards 
              Kingship, when he had no real interest in this, and when he had 
              firmly decided that David would be king, not himself , when the 
              Kingdom was established (23:17). There must be hundreds of Christians-cum-high 
              flying executives worldwide who can identify completely with this 
              scenario.    
            The bitterness underlying Saul's words in 20:30,31 indicates a 
              certain element of love-hate in Jonathan's relationship with Saul. 
              We can sense this in the record of 1 Sam.14, when Jonathan overcame 
              the Philistine garrison whilst his father cowered away in nervous 
              faithlessness. How jealous Saul must have been! Jealousy was one 
              of Saul's characteristics (1), 
              and it is subconsciously a major feature of the world's aggression 
              towards us; for the world is  passively aggressive 
              (cp. Gen.3:15), if only we manifest Christ as we should. Saul almost 
              seems to have contrived his command not to eat on pain of death 
              in order to incriminate his son, whom he knew would not have heard 
              his prohibition. The way in which he says that even if it were Jonathan 
              who had eaten, then he must die (14:39), seems to suggest that Saul 
              was actually looking for an excuse to kill Jonathan. This love-hate 
              relationship between Jonathan and Saul is exactly typical of ours 
              with the world and our own flesh.    
            There were times when Jonathan's relationship with Saul and the 
              court became more strained than at others. Their all consuming desire 
              was increasingly the destruction of David. Our surrounding world 
              has a similar, obsessive, anti-Christ enthusiasm to which we are 
              diametrically opposed. It would seem that Saul's whole family turned 
              against David. A comparison of 1 Chron.10:6 and 1 Sam.31:6 shows 
              a parallel between the house of Saul and his men; and it was the 
              men of Saul who aided Saul in persecuting David (23:25,26). Further 
              divergence between David and Saul's family is shown by the fact 
              that Michal, Saul's daughter, either left David or was divorced 
              by him (2 Sam.2:2 cp. 6:20).  Yet despite this, Jonathan's 
              intensity of relationship with David meant that he was not ashamed 
              to speak up for him: " Jonathan spake good of David unto Saul 
              his father, and said unto him, Let not the king  sin 
              against his servant...because his works have been to thee-ward very 
              good: for he...slew the Philistine" (19:4,5). Note how he calls 
              Saul " the King" , suggesting a certain detachment from 
              him. The vision of David standing triumphant over Goliath still 
              motivated Jonathan, to the extent that he could stand up in that 
              hostile environment and testify to the love of David, the extent 
              of his selfless victory, and the urgent need for this to be recognized 
              by men. The spirit of our preaching only occasionally matches this 
              example. No wonder the record stresses Jonathan as being typical 
              of ourselves.    
            Despite this, the record reveals a certain closeness between Saul 
              and Jonathan in Jonathan's relationship with Saul. David recognized 
              this when he reflected that even in their death they were not divided 
              (2 Sam.1:23). Perhaps this means that they died fighting next to 
              each other.  Consider the following: 
            
              - The description of Jonathan as the son of Saul occurs a massive 
                23 times; the connection between them is certainly highlighted. 
               
              - We have mentioned that Jonathan had Gideon as his personal 
                hero. Yet there is ample evidence that Saul too saw Gideon in 
                this light (2). 
                Does this suggest that in his more spiritual days, Saul successfully 
                imparted his spiritual enthusiasm for Gideon to his son in Sunday 
                school lessons?  
              - Mephibosheth is called Saul's son (2 Sam.9:7,10; 19:24), although 
                he was actually Jonathan's son. This suggests that the son was 
                brought up in Saul's house. This certainly does not give the impression 
                that Jonathan separated himself from his father's house. 
              - Jonathan was commander of the army (13:2). When he gave " 
                the  robe that was upon him" to David (18:4), 
                he was effectively making David the commander (cp. 2 Chron.18:9,29). 
                Thus when " Saul set (David) over the men of war" (18:5), 
                he was tacitly going along with Jonathan's wish, even though by 
                this time he had already heard the women praising David more than 
                himself, and his bitter jealousy against David had already begun 
                (18:6). This little point simply shows the external unity of action 
                between Saul and Jonathan.   
             
            This closeness in Jonathan's relationship with Saul shows the emotional 
              tangle which Jonathan was in on account of his relationship with 
              David. If we truly love Christ, and if we are honest enough to come 
              to terms with the pull of our own natures, we will be going through 
              exactly the same. Our Lord seems to have seen in Jonathan a type 
              of ourselves. In the context of warning us that loyalty to him would 
              mean confessing him before men and conflict between fathers and 
              sons, he encourages us that not a hair of our head will perish (Mt.10:30 
              cp. Lk.21:18). This is picking up the application of this phrase 
              to Jonathan in 14:45.  
             
            Notes  
            (1) Saul's jealousy is most clearly 
              shown by his resentment of how the women praised David more than 
              himself. But consider too how Saul gave David his armour, as did 
              Jonathan (" garments" in 18:4 is the same word as " 
              armour" in 17:38). David accepted Jonathan's gift, but rejected 
              Saul's.  
            (2) The following is the evidence 
              that Saul saw Gideon as his spiritual hero: 1 Sam.11:11 = Jud.7:16; 
              13:5 = Jud.7:12; 13:6 = Gideon offering before fighting Midian; 
              14:5,20 = Jud.7:22; 14:24 = imitating Gideon and his men going without 
              food; 14:28,31 = Jud.8:4,5; 11:7 = Gideon killing his father's oxen.  |