1-10 Divine Delegation
The parables several times speak of the relationship between our Master
and ourselves. They do so in somewhat unreal and arresting terms. It would’ve
made everyone think when the Lord spoke of how a master handed over a
total of eight talents to His servants and told them to use them as best
they could. This was, humanly speaking, a huge and unreal risk for a master
to take. He so trusted those servants! And so much has the Lord
delegated to each of us, entrusting us with the Gospel. And we can imagine
His joy when they lived up to the trust He placed in them. We can also
imagine them walking away from their meeting with Him, wondering why ever
He had entrusted so much to them, feeling nervous, praying for strength
to act responsibly and zealously. Think about how large were the talents
given to the workers (Mt. 25:14-30). The talent was worth 6,000 denarii,
i.e. 20 years’ wages for the workers in the parable of the labourers (Mt.
10:1-16). This is a huge and unrealistic amount to give to a servant to
have responsibility for! But this is the huge responsibility which passes
to us in having been called to the Gospel. Likewise, what human Owner
of a vineyard who give out his vineyard to other tenants, after
the first lot had proven so wicked, and killed not only His servants but
His beloved Son? But this speaks of God’s amazing desire to keep on delegating
His affairs to frail mortals.
The
Lord was addressed as ‘Rabbi’ and to some extent acted like one.
It was the well known duty of a rabbi’s pupils to serve their teacher
and do menial chores for him; the Jewish writings of the time and
the Mishnah are full of references to this. Yet the Lord treated
His ‘servants’ radically differently- His behaviour at the Last
Supper was just the opposite (Lk. 22:26). And He even taught that
He, the Lord of all, would be so happy that His servants were waiting
for Him that He would “come forth and serve them” (Lk. 12:37). He
was a most unusual “Lord and Master”, one who served His servants,
and whose death for them was His ultimate act of service. The Lord
speaks of how we are not so much slaves, as friends of His, who
are obedient to His commands (Jn. 15:15). To the Lord’s first
hearers, a slave was defined by his or her obedience to the master’s
commands. The Lord says that His followers are His friends, who
do His commandments- but they’re not slaves. He seems to be
saying that they were indeed His slaves- but a new kind of slave,
a slave who whilst being obedient to the Master, was also His personal
friend. It’s lovely how the Lord speaks of such well known
ideas like slavery, and shows how in the humdrum of ordinary life,
He gives an altogether higher value to them. It’s like in
the imagery of sheep. This unreal shepherd not only dies for the
sheep but gives them eternal life, making them eternal sheep (Jn.
10:28). We’d understand it more comfortably if He spoke of
giving His life for people, and then them living for ever. But He
speaks of giving eternal life to a sheep, who wouldn’t have
a clue what that really entailed. But that’s just how it is
with us, who by grace are receiving an eternal Kingdom, the wonderful
implications of which are beyond our appreciation, due to the intrinsic
limitations of who we are as sheep.
The Father has given
us huge freewill and an amazing amount of self determination. Divine
delegation is one of His great characteristics as a Father. It would
have been highly unusual for any father to agree to liquidate part
of the family estate ahead of time, just so as to give in to the
will of a wayward son who totally rejected him. And yet the father
did this; he liquidated part of the family inheritance to give it
to a son who wanted to openly quit the family. This is how much
the Father is willing to give us the essential desires of our own
hearts, how much He is willing to allow us to go our own way, so
that we may serve Him of our own freewill.
In the culture of the
orient, it was not usual for a person to keep money in a cloth.
Their culture was to trade and barter with what they had. That a
man should just bury such a talent was therefore unreal for the
original hearers. The point of this unreality is surely that spiritual
laziness is so bad. It was better to have traded and lost
through genuine mistakes, through naievity, through the betrayal
and deception of others, than to simply do nothing. I fear,
really fear, that our Christian culture has bred for many of us
a ‘do nothing’ culture- which is exactly what this element of unreality
is warning against. We can delegate responsibility to church committees,
to others, to our leaders; or we can do nothing out of fear, fear
of making a mistake, fear of taking a risk, fear of what other brethren
may think of us… all the time denying this principle of Divine delegation.
And it might be added that the ‘do nothing’ man of the parable emphasized
that the talent or money was not his; he returned to his
Lord what was his [“thy talent”]. In order to trade it,
or even to put it in the bank and get interest, he had to take personal
ownership of it. And this he failed to do. And it is just this that
we are being asked to do by our Lord- that His truth, all that He
has given us, is in a sense ours now, to be used on our
initiative, for His glory and service. Indeed, the reward of the
faithful will be to be given more of their Lord’s riches
in the Kingdom, with which likewise to use their initiative in order
to bring Him glory. We are left to think how the story might
have gone on- the faithful were given more talents and
they go away and do, in the Kingdom age, what they did in this life-
using what they were given for His glory and service, on their
own initiative.
The parable of the widow who keeps nagging the free-wheeling judge is
again rather humanly unlikely. Would such a tough guy really pay attention
to the repeated requests of the woman? But although he considers himself
independent of both God and men, he ends up being controlled by the widow.
This reflects the immense power which there is in human prayer, and God’s
willingness to respond if we are importunate enough. |