12. Christian Self-Perception
With nothing less than a touch of genius, David Levin wrote: “Identity
holds the most strategic position in our minds, and will have more
impact on our behaviour than any single belief or bit of information.
We can think of ourselves as " a child of God," or
" a disciple." Or, we can think of ourselves
as " a loser," or as " a victim."
Our identity shifts slowly, and is far more than the sum of
what we do and where we do it. Someone once remarked, "
We are human beings, not human doings." Whatever we think
of ourselves will guide our lives. God sees us at this level, as
He does not measure our behaviour or even our attitudes separately.
He only sees a whole: a sheep or a goat. There’s no such thing,
in God’s eyes, as " a pretty good goat," or a
" not-so-good-sheep." He judges, completely and
ineffably, at the identity level. Either we are disciples, or we
are not. Identity is the most important force in determining our
lives. Even more important, God’s assessment of our identity will
determine our eternal destiny” (1).
And the Lord Jesus came to proclaim “the opening of the prison”,
or “the opening of the eyes to them that are bound” (Is. 61:1 RVmg.)-
He came to open blind eyes, to change the self-perceptions which
imprison most of humanity. The Israelites were seen as grasshoppers
by their enemies- and so this is how they came to perceive themselves
(Num. 13:33). Prov. 23:7 RV observes: “As he reckoneth within himself,
so is he”. We are defined by our own self-perception. We must come
in the end to perceive ourselves from God’s perspective and not
according to how men perceive us. We must see ourselves from outside
ourselves, and thereby “guide thine own heart in the way” (Prov.
23:19).
We are to live out in practice what we have been made in status by
our gracious Father. The very fact He counts us as in Christ, as the
spotless bride of His Son, must be both felt and lived up to by us.
The way He counts us like this is a wonderful motivation to rise up
to it all. Consider how God told Israel that if they kept
His commandments, then they would be His “peculiar treasure”
(Ex. 19:5). This conditional promise is then referred to by Moses
as having been fulfilled- Israel became His “peculiar treasure” by
status even though they did not keep His commandments (Dt.
7:6; 14:2 s.w.; Ps. 135:4). Moses concludes by saying that “the Lord
hath avouched thee this day to be his peculiar people [s.w.]…that
thou shouldest keep all his commandments” (Dt. 26:18). See what’s
happening here. God said that if they were obedient, then
they would be His special people. Yet He counted them as His special
people even though they were not obedient. And He did this so that
they would be so touched by this grace that they would be
obedient.
Consider how we perceive baptism. Some will say ‘I became a Christian
on [20.11.83]’, or ‘I became a member of the XYZ ecclesia on ...’.
They mean, that’s when they were baptized. Others will perceive it
as: ‘I was baptized into Christ on 20.11.83...I accepted the Truth
on...I committed myself to the Lord’s service on...I came to Christ
on...’. None of these are wrong. They are all true. My suggestion,
and my own perception of my own baptism, is that it was a personal
joining with the Lord Jesus Christ. This, it seems to me, must be
the central perception which dominates our self-awareness. The human
side of it- the name of the group or ecclesia- is true, and needs
in some contexts to be ever remembered, but it is only the human side.
The church, the ecclesia we joined...all these things will fade away,
as time takes its course. But the essence will eternally remain: that
we are in Christ, we share in His life and live it out, seeking to
act as He would in every situation we face, and this is the life we
will eternally live by His grace.
Present Salvation
It could appear that I am saying ‘It’s not so important what we believe’.
No, I don’t mean that at all. We should be proud of our brotherhood
and of our little part in it. What I’m saying is that first and foremost,
we are God’s children. The height and depth of who we are
right now, and who we will be, is such that it makes all
else, including the fact we bear the name of some particular church,
of very much secondary importance. Many a town and village has its
share of small time Protestant religions- JWs, Adventists, Baptists.
May it not be that we perceive ourselves as just another such group,
and nothing else; just another ordinary guy who wants God in his life,
who has a religious conscience which is salved by baptism and attending
church meetings. We are saved, in prospect, here and now. We have
been translated into the Kingdom (Col. 1:13), we have been saved (2
Tim. 1:9), on account of being in Christ we not only died and resurrected
with Him in baptism, but also afterwards ascended with Him and are
as it were in heavenly places with Him (Eph. 2:5,6); our life is hid
with Christ in God (Col. 3:3). We are in the process of receiving
a Kingdom (Heb. 12:28 Gk.). “We have eternal life” (1 Jn. 5:13). We
need to take a long, careful look at this question. You are in Christ;
you will be there, in the Kingdom. In a sense, you are
there. Me? Really me, I will be there? Yes, that’s
what these verses teach.
Perhaps you work such long hours you have little time to think, perhaps
children demand all your attention. Perhaps the problems of your own
personality grip your mind as you struggle with them subconsciously,
every waking minute. But please. Make some time. Just 5 straight minutes
alone. To think through the above verses. That because you were baptized
into Christ and continue in Him, and have not rejected His grace,
you will be there, and in a sense, you are there.
We are constituted a Kingdom of priests now (Rev. 1:6; Ex.
19:6 cp. 1 Pet. 2:5,9). Take time to think it through, to the point
that you feel that little gasp within you. Brethren, this is no philosophy
we have believed, no piece of intellectual fascination we stumbled
across along life’s way. This is the Truth, the eternal and saving
Truth. A man cannot face these things and not have a deep impression
of the absoluteness of the issues involved in faith and unbelief,
in choosing to accept or reject the work of the struggling, gasping
Man who hung on the stake to achieve it. It truly is a question of
believe and be saved, or reject it and perish. And we have believed.
We are not of them who draw back, who throw it all away and end in
the gutter, but of those who believe to the saving of the soul by
grace (Heb. 10:39). We perceive ourselves [as we walk down the street
or play with our children, or as we lay awake at night staring at
the ceiling, at the light shade, lost in introspection…] as winners,
as more-than-conquerors, as those who will be there, as those who
are there, those on the way there. On the other hand, if we perceive
ourselves as losers, this is who we will be. Israel felt that “we
were in our own sight as grasshoppers, and so we were in their
sight” (Num. 13:33). According to how they felt that the world perceived
them to be, so they felt themselves to be. As it happened, they were
wrong; the Canaanite nations were terrified of them, according to
Rahab’s inside account. If Israel had perceived themselves as those
made strong by the Lord, more than conquerors, so indeed they would
have been. Self-perception was and is vital for God’s Israel.
The Lord bid us cut off the hand or foot that offends, and thus enter
into life halt...blind, rather than be condemned in Gehenna (Mt. 18:8,9).
It sounds as if ‘entering into life’ means entering into the Kingdom;
and so it can do, for this clause is set as the antithesis for being
condemned at the last day. Yet it is hard to imagine us entering the
Kingdom somehow maimed, and in any case then we will not need to be
without what causes temptation. The figure rings more true to our
lives today; if we cut off our flesh now, we will live the
rest of our mortal days somehow lacking what we could have had. In
this case, we enter into life right now, insofar as we cut off the
opportunities of the flesh. Jesus told another man that if he would
enter into life, he must keep the commandments (Mt. 19:17). Insofar
as he kept those commands, he would right now enter into life. We
are entering into the experience of the real life, the “eternal life”,
right now! Likewise the camel must shed its load of riches and goods,
so that it can pass through the gate into the Kingdom. But we are
doing that right now! We will pass through the gate into the Kingdom
when the Lord returns (Rev. 22:14), and yet through shedding our materialism,
we do it in prospect now. John puts it more bluntly and yet more absolutely:
now, through the life of faith, we have the eternal life, in that
we begin to live now the type of life which we will eternally live.
We receive the Kingdom of God here and now, in that we receive the
Gospel of the Kingdom; and if we accept it as a little child, we begin
to enter it, now- in that the lives we live determine whether or not
we will enter it at the Lord’s coming. We are on our way into life!
We have received the Kingdom, our names were written from the foundation
of the world, and only our falling from grace can take that away.
This is almost too good news to believe.
Imputed Righteousness
How can it be? Throughout Romans, the point is made that the Lord
counts as righteous those that believe; righteousness is
imputed to us the unrighteous (Rom. 2:26; 4:3,4,5,6,8,9,10,11,22,23,24;
8:36; 9:8). But the very same Greek word is used of our self-perception.
We must count / impute ourselves as righteous men and women, and count
each other as righteous on the basis of recognising each others’ faith
rather than works: “Therefore we conclude [we count / impute / consider]
that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law... Likewise
reckon [impute] ye also yourselves to be dead indeed unto sin, but
alive unto God through Jesus Christ our Lord”. (Rom. 3:28; 6:11).
We should feel clean and righteous, and act accordingly,
both in our own behaviour and in our feelings towards each other.
Border-line language and expressions, clothing with worldly slogans,
watching violence and pornography...these are not things which will
be done by someone who feels and perceives him/herself to be clean
and righteous, “in Christ”. The mind of love imputes no evil to others,
as God doesn’t to us (1 Cor. 13:5; AV “thinketh no evil”, s.w. to
count / impute in Romans). And again the word occurs in 2 Cor 3:5:
“Not that we are sufficient of ourselves to think [s.w. impute]
any thing as of ourselves; but our sufficiency is of God”. We are
able to count / feel to ourselves as righteous; for God has counted
us righteous.
We are “in Christ” to the extent that we are Christ to this
world. In this sense He has in this world no arms or legs or face
than us. “The Son of God, Jesus Christ, was preached among you through
us, even through me and Silvanus” (2 Cor. 1:19 RVmg.). Paul was a
placarding of Christ crucified before the Galatians (Gal. 3:1 Gk.);
to the Corinthians he was “the face of Christ” (2 Cor. 2:10 RSV).
There is a prophecy of the Lord Jesus preaching: “How beautiful are
the feet of him that preaches the Gospel” (Nah. 1:15); but
it is quoted in Rom. 10:15 with a subtle change of pronoun: “How beautiful
are the feet of them that preach”. We are the Lord Jesus
to this world, because we are brethren in Him. This alone is a powerful
imperative as to who we are, how we speak, the men and women we show
ourselves to be. Imputed righteousness is given us on the basis of
our faith. This means that insofar as we can believe all this is true,
so it will be. In this sense “The Spirit itself beareth witness with
our spirit, that we are the children of God” (Rom 8:16). We are His
dear children (Eph. 5:1), the pride and joy of Almighty God, counted
as wonderful and righteous by Him. And further, we are Christ to our
brethren. The “master of the house” is representative of Jesus in
Lk. 13:25; and yet we are to be the “master of the house” in spiritually
feeding our brethren (Mt. 24:43,45 RV). It is through us that He ministers
to His household.
The Body Of Christ
We are the body of Christ. We are counted righteous because we are
baptized into Him. We are counted as Him; and we are parts of His
body, hands, feet, eyes, internal organs. As such, we are inextricably
linked in with the other members of the body. We cannot operate in
isolation from them. “We are members one of another...we are members
of his body” (Eph. 4:25; 5:30). Only insofar as we belong to each
other do we belong to Him. We must perceive ourselves not so much
as individual believers but as members of one body, both over space
and over time. We must soberly ‘think of ourselves’ as someone who
has something to contribute to the rest of the body, even if first
of all we are not sure what it is (Rom. 15:3-8). We feel their weaknesses
as if they are our own. Self interest must die; their wellbeing becomes
all consuming. This is why men like Daniel and Nehemiah could feel
that “we have sinned...”- not ‘they have sinned’.
Ezra said that because we have sinned, we cannot
lift up ourselves before Yahweh. And he cast himself down before Yahweh
in demonstration of how much he was with his people in this (Ezra
9:15; 10:1)! Esther, in an eloquent type of the Lord’s mediation for
us, risked her life because she felt that “we are sold, I
and my people, to be destroyed” (Es. 7:4). If she’d have kept her
mouth shut, she wouldn’t have been destroyed. But she fought
and won the same battle as we have daily or weekly before us: to identify
ourselves with our weaker and more suffering brethren. The Lord Jesus
didn’t sin Himself but He took upon Himself our sins- to the extent
that He felt a sinner, even though He wasn’t. Our response
to this utter and saving grace is to likewise take upon ourselves
the infirmities and sins of our brethren. If one is offended, we burn
too; if one is weak, we are weak; we bear the infirmities of the weak
(Rom. 15:1). But in the context of that passage, Paul is quoting from
Is. 53:11, about how the Lord Jesus bore our sins on the cross. We
live out the spirit of His cross, not in just bearing with our difficulties
in isolation, but in feeling for our weak brethren.
If we believe that we are counted righteous, we must likewise assume
that all those properly baptized are equally righteous, and will be
saved along with us. We cannot condemn each other; therefore we must
assume each other will be saved. If we have a positive attitude to
our own salvation, we will likewise perceive our whole community.
And the reverse is true; if we cannot believe that God sees us
positively, we will tend towards a negative outlook upon ourselves.
My sense is that many of us fail in this area. Paul had many reasons
to think negatively of his converts; and yet he writes to the Thessalonians
as if ‘we all’, all his readership, would be saved (1 Thess. 4:17).
And likewise to dodgy Corinth, he writes as if they would all be accepted
at the Lord’s return (1 Cor. 15:52); he saw them all as innocent
Eve in danger of being beguiled (2 Cor. 11:3).
The Two Pauls
But we are real life men and women, only too aware that although
yes, we are in Christ, we are also all too human still. We still sin
the sins and think the thoughts and feel the feelings of those around
us. We are only who we are, born in such a town, living in such a
city, doing a job, trying to provide for a family. In our minds eye
we see the spotless lamb of God, moving around Galilee 2000 years
ago, doing good, preaching the Gospel, healing the sick. But He was
there, and we are here now, today, in all our weakness and worldly
distraction. He was as He was, but we are as we are. We each
have two ‘people’ as it were within us; we act both as spiritual and
as fleshly people. The record of Hezekiah in 2 Kings 18:16 reflects
this: “At that time did Hezekiah cut off the gold from…pillars which
Hezekiah king of Judah had overlaid, because of the king of Assyria”.
The Hezekiah who faithfully overlaid the pillars with gold was the
same man, acting a different persona, who then cut it off faithlessly
when under pressure. Likewise the Jews could be described as both
Abraham’s seed (Jn. 8:37) and not Abraham’s seed (Jn. 8:39); as having
Abraham as their father (Jn. 8:56), and yet also having the devil
as their father (Jn. 8:39-41,44).
Reading through his letters, it is apparent that Paul saw himself
as two people: a natural man, a Jew from Tarsus, a Roman citizen living
in the Mediterranean world...and also, a man in Christ. He speaks
of how “I bruise myself”, as if the one Paul was boxing against the
other Paul (1 Cor. 9:27 RVmg.). This is why in an autobiographical
passage in 2 Cor. 12, he says of himself: “I knew a man in Christ”,
who had great visions 14 years previously (at the council of Jerusalem
of Acts 15), and who was subsequently given a “thorn in the flesh”.
“Of such an one will I glory: yet of myself I will not glory”, he
writes (2 Cor 12:5), as if separating himself from this more spiritually
exalted man who saw these visions. Paul is surely telling us that
he sees himself as two people. He makes the point clearly: “I will
not be a fool...I am become a fool” (:6,11). He was the greatest apostle;
although he was nothing (:11). This language comes to a crisis in
12:10: “When I [i.e. the natural Paul] am weak, then am I [the spiritual
Paul] strong”. Consider how this dualism is to be found in many other
places:
The Natural Paul |
The Spiritual Paul |
Paul could say: “I am a Pharisee...I
am a man which am a Jew” (Acts 23:6; 21:13,39; 22:3; 2 Cor.
11:22) Circumcision and being Jewish has ‘much advantage’
(Rom. 3:1,2). “Circumcised the eighth day, of the stock
of Israel” (Phil. 3:5). He argues that all Jews are “the
seed of Abraham”, including himself, by birth (2 Cor. 11:22). |
But he also stresses that “they
are not all Israel who are of Israel” because only “the
children of the promise”, those baptized into Christ, are
counted as the seed (Gal. 3:16,27-29; Rom. 9:8). The spiritual
Paul is neither Jew nor Gentile. The ‘gain’ of being
personally Jewish Paul counted as loss (Phil. 3:3-7). His
circumcision meant nothing (Rom. 2:29; 1 Cor. 7:19). “We
are the circumcision, which worship God in the spirit...and
have no confidence in the flesh [i.e. the fact of literal
circumcision, see context]” (Phil. 3:7) |
“We who are Jews by nature and
not sinners of the Gentiles” (Gal. 2:15) |
This contrasts sharply with Paul’s
whole message that in Christ, there is neither Jew nor Gentile,
and both groups are all equally sinners (Rom. 3:9,23). He
speaks of “theirs is the covenants, the receiving of the
law, the temple worship…theirs are the patriarchs” (Rom.
9:4,5). He clearly dissociates himself from Jewry. He had
to become like a Jew in order to save them, although
he was Jewish (2 Cor. 9:20). He carefully kept parts of
the law (Acts 18:18; 21:26; 1 Cor. 8:13). To the Jew he
became [again] as a Jew; and to the Gentiles he became as
a Gentile (1 Cor. 9:20). He acted “To them that are
without law, as without law...”. He was “dead to the law”
(Gal. 2:19) He was a Jew but considered he had renounced
it, but he became as a Jew to them to help them. He saw
no difference between Jew and Gentile (Gal. 3:27-29) but
he consciously acted in a Jewish or Gentile way to help
those who still perceived themselves after the flesh. “...(being
not without law to God, but under the law to Christ)” (1
Cor 9:21). |
I am carnal (Rom. 7:14) |
But in Christ he was not carnal
(1 Cor. 3:1 s.w.) |
No flesh may glory before God (1
Cor. 1:29) |
Paul, in his spiritual man, as
counted righteous before God, could glory (Rom. 15:17). |
“Not as though I had already attained,
either were already perfect” |
“Let us therefore, as many as be
perfect…” (Phil. 3:12,15). In 1 Cor. 13:10, he considers
he is ‘perfect’, and has put away the things of childhood.
Thus he saw his spiritual maturity only on account of his
being in Christ; for he himself was not “already perfect”,
he admitted. |
“ I laboured more abundantly than
they all... |
... yet not I, but the
grace of God which was with me” (1 Cor 15:10) |
God set the apostles first
in the ecclesia (1 Cor. 12:28) |
God set the apostles last
in the ecclesia (1 Cor. 4:9) |
“I live... |
... yet not I,
but Christ liveth in me [the new ‘me’]... I [the old ‘me’]
am crucified with Christ” (Gal 2:20) (2) |
“I am the apostle of the Gentiles,
I magnify mine office” (Rom. 11:13). He considered himself
rightfully amongst the very chiefest apostles (2 Cor. 12:11). |
He “supposed”, the same word translated
“impute” as in ‘imputed righteousness’, that he was amongst
the chiefest apostles (2 Cor. 11:5). He knew this was how
his Lord counted him. But he felt himself as less than the
least of all saints (Eph. 3:8). “For I am the least of the
apostles, that am not meet to be called an apostle, because
I persecuted the church of God. But by the grace of God
I am what I am” (1 Cor 15:9-10). |
This all shows that Paul wasn’t so heavenly that he was no earthly
good. He saw himself from outside himself, as a Jew, as a Pharisee
from Tarsus. And he used that self-understanding to get his message
over to ordinary people. He could turn it on and he could turn it
off; to the Jew he acted as a Jew, to the Gentiles as a Gentile. To
the spiritually weak, he became as weak. He didn’t think ‘Well this
is how I am, you’ll just have to put up with me and take me for who
I am’. He was far more sensitive to others than to be so selfish.
Sadly, this former attitude is all too common amongst our community.
We can delude ourselves that it is a sin to adapt, concede, compromise,
tolerate, submit…obtuseness and angularity can become glorified in
the name of upholding a true position. But in spiritual reality, others
don’t have to put up with us- we have to make ourselves all things
to all. Paul did this to the extent that he was slanderously accused
of inconsistency by the Corinthians. Although Paul made himself all
things to all men, he didn’t just seek to please men (Gal. 1:10; 1
Thess. 2:4). He sought their salvation and approached them in appropriate
terms, but he didn’t just seek to please them from a human viewpoint.
He didn’t cheapen the Gospel. But most importantly, his own internal
self-perception was that he was neither Jew nor Gentile but in Christ;
a citizen of Heavenly Jerusalem, far more than earthly Rome (although
he used that Roman citizenship at times). The Corinthians were mainly
Gentiles, but Paul speaks of them as “When ye were Gentiles…” (2 Cor.
12:2 RV). They had a new racial identity in Christ, and yet, he also
reminded them at times that they were Gentiles. We too cannot obliterate
who we are or where we came from. But superimposed upon this must
be the realisation than now, we are in Christ.
All this opens a window into our understanding of 2 Cor. 10:10: “His
bodily presence is weak, and his speech contemptible”. Yet this is
hardly how Paul comes over at his trials. The conclusion surely is
that Paul made himself a weak person in his dealings with Corinth.
He could truly be all things to all people, he wasn’t constrained
by his natural personality type as so many of us allow ourselves to
be. This is why Paul could go on in v. 11 to warn Corinth that the
next time he visits them, he won’t be weak. He will ‘be’ as he is
in his letters. In all this we see the full import of the sacrifice
and crucifixion of self of which the Lord repeatedly speaks. Putting
meaning into words, this means that we will genuinely ‘be’ the person
we need to be in order to help others. And thus he could say: “I protest
by that glorying in you, brethren, which I have in Christ Jesus our
Lord, I die daily” (1 Cor. 15:31 RV). By this he perhaps means that
because he was daily crucified with Christ, he was thereby able to
rejoice in them; to overcome the pain and hurt which their treatment
of him would naturally give rise to, because he could be another person.
That new person could rejoice in the Corinthians and view them so
positively.
The Self-Perception Of Jesus…
Likewise the record of the Lord’s wilderness temptations is almost
certainly a reflection of His self-perception; He spoke to
the ‘devil’ / personification of sin which was within Him, He saw
Himself as two people, and His spiritual man triumphed gloriously
against the man of the flesh. Lk. 4:8 records how “Jesus answered
and said unto him, Get thee behind me, Satan: for it is written, Thou
shalt worship the Lord thy God, and him only shalt thou serve”. He
understood that we can only serve two masters: God or the flesh (“mammon”
is another personification of the flesh, similar to ‘satan’). He saw
His own flesh, His own internal thoughts, as a master begging to be
served which He must totally reject. His words are a quotation from
Dt. 6:13, which warns Israel to serve Yahweh alone and not idols.
He perceived His own natural mind and desire as an idol calling to
be served. When the Lord explained what had happened in the wilderness
to the disciples and thereby to the Gospel writers, He opened His
heart to them. He gave us all a window on how He perceived Himself,
as He sought to explain to men the internal struggles of the Son of
God. Bringing it all back home, I must ask firstly how much we even
struggle with temptation? And as and when we do, would we
not be helped by the Lord’s example of talking to ourselves, and personalising
Scripture as He did? ‘You don’t want to do that! Give up
your place in the Kingdom, for that...drug, that girl, that job? Of
course not! Come on. There is a way of escape; Paul told
me God won’t try me beyond my strength, He will make me a way of escape’.
The Lord in the wilderness was representative of us all. He was led
of the Spirit at that time (Mt. 4:1); and Paul uses just those words
of us in our present experience of trial (Rom. 8:14).
…and David
David too writes in the Psalms as if he sees himself from outside
of himself. Ps. 132 is a good example, where he speaks of David
in all his afflictions. Ps. 131:2 RV has him speaking of stilling
and quieting his soul like a mother does a child- as if he saw himself
as the mother to his own soul, talking to himself.
Serious Sinners
We shouldn’t be discouraged if in our self perception we see ourselves
as serious sinners. We must say of ourselves that “we are unprofitable
servants” (Lk. 17:10)- i.e. condemned, for this is how the phrase
is used elsewhere in the Lord’s thinking (Mt. 25:30). This is the
finest paradox of all. If we perceive ourselves as worthy of
condemnation, we will be saved. If we would judge [i.e. condemn] ourselves,
we will not be judged / condemned (1 Cor. 11:31). This is written
in the context of the breaking of bread. When we examine ourselves
then, and at other times, do we get to the point where we truly feel
through and through our condemnation? If this is how we perceive our
natural selves, then surely we will be saved- if we also
believe with joy that God’s righteousness is counted to us. Over time,
Paul’s perception of his own sinfulness increased. The following quotes
are in chronological sequence:
“I am the least of the apostles” (1 Cor. 15:9);
“Less than the least of all saints” (Eph. 3:8)
“Chief of sinners” (1 Tim. 1:15).
There is a tension between the fact we are saved in prospect
and absolutely assured, by grace, of a place in the Kingdom; and the
evident awareness we must have of our own inadequacy and condemnation;
that sense of the future we might miss. In the age to come, we will
no doubt realise that this is how it had to be. But for now, we are
left with that almost irresolvable tension.
Christ Centredness
If we believe that we are counted righteous, we will with joy and
gratitude be people who are centred upon another man- the Lord Jesus,
the Saviour who made this great salvation possible. We run the risk,
it seems to me, of being Bible centred rather than Christ centred;
a community of Bible students, a kind of learned society that has
more Biblical learning and erudition than most other ‘Christian’ communities;
but precious little else. The man Christ Jesus must dominate our individual
and collective consciousness, and the true doctrines we are blessed
to know must enable this the more powerfully in practice. We must
see in that Man who had fingernails, hair, who needed to shave, who
sneezed and blinked, the very Son of God; the Man who should dominate
our thinking and being. And we must grasp the wonder of the fact that
from the larynx of a Palestinian Jew came the words of Almighty God.
All that was true of natural Israel becomes a warning for us, Israel
after the spirit. The tension between the following of Jesus and merely
studying the pages of the Bible for academic truth is brought out
in the Lord’s encounter with the Jews in Jn. 5:39: “Search the scriptures;
for in them ye think ye have eternal life: [but] ye will not come
to me that ye might have life”. Surely the Lord is using
irony here: as if to say, ‘Go on searching through the scrolls, thinking
as you do that finding true exposition will bring you eternal life.
But you must come to me, the word-made-flesh, the living
and eternal life, if you wish to find it’.
God Manifestation
We bear the Name of Yahweh / Jehovah, by reason of our baptism into
it. His Name is declared as His character- merciful, truthful, judging
sin, patient etc (Ex. 34:5-7). He who will be who He will be, manifesting
His characteristics as He does so, must have His way in us too.
Babylon and Nineveh were condemned for having the attitude that
“I am, and there is none beside me” (Is. 47:8; Zeph. 2:15). Their
self-perception was a parody on the Name and being of Yahweh: He
alone can say “I am, and there is none else” (Is. 43:11; 44:6; 45:6,21)
and seek to be who He is. He alone can seek to articulate the characteristics
that make up His Name onto the lives of others, and onto the things
that comprise His Kingdom. We are not to be who we are; to ‘just
be yourself’; to ‘just do it’, as foolish slogans and adverts encourage
us. We are here to show forth His mercy, truth, judgment of sin,
patient saving of the weak etc., not our own personality. We are,
in the very end, Yahweh manifested to this world, through our imitation
of the Lord Jesus. Paul was alluding to the Yahweh Name (as he often
does) when he wrote: “...by the grace of God I am what I am”
(1 Cor 15:10) (3). ‘Yahweh’ means all
of three things: I am who I am, I was who I was, and I will be who
I will be. It doesn’t only mean ‘I will be manifested in
the future’ in a prophetic sense; that manifestation has been ongoing,
and most importantly it is going on through us here and
now. Paul felt Yahweh’s insistent manifestation of the principles
of His Name through and in himself and his life’s work. We are right
now, in who we are, Yahweh’s witnesses to Himself unto
this world, just as Israel were meant to have been. Thus he felt
“jealous with the jealousy of God” over his converts (2 Cor. 11:2);
jealousy is a characteristic of the Yahweh Name, and Paul felt it,
in that the Name was being expressed through him and his feelings.
His threat that “I will not spare” (2 Cor. 13:2) is full of allusion
to Yahweh’s similar final threats to an apostate Israel. “As he
is [another reference to the Name] so are we in this
world” (1 Jn. 4:17). Appreciating this means that our witness is
to be more centred around who we essentially are than what
we do.
Jesus Is Our Lord
There are some passages which appear to teach [misread] that we go
on living after death. It has been observed that Rom. 14:8,9 implies
that Jesus is our Lord after death as well as in life: “For
whether we live, we live unto the Lord; and whether we die, we die
unto the Lord: whether we live therefore, or die, we are the Lord's.
For to this end Christ both died, and rose, and revived, that he might
be Lord both of the dead and living”. We are the Lord’s after death,
in the same way as Abraham lives unto Him (Lk. 20:38). We are still
with Him. He doesn’t forget us when we die, just as I will remember
my mother till the day of my death, regardless of when she dies. But
if the Lord doesn’t come, I will die, and my memory, my love, my fondness,
will perish (for a small moment). But God doesn’t die, His memory
doesn’t fade and distort as ours does; images of us don’t come in
and out of His mind with greater intensity and insistence at some
times than at others; He remembers us constantly and will remember
us after our death, right up until when the Lord comes.
Because of this, He is the God of Abraham; Abraham is alive
in the mind of God, He remembers his faith and his offering of Isaac,
just as much as He was aware of it in Abraham’s lifetime. The works
of the dead follow them, in the sense that once they finish their
labours their works are still in the memory of the Father (Rev. 14:13);
for what father would not remember his dead child’s ways and deeds?
This is why Rom. 14:8,9 says that Jesus is our Lord after death just
as much as He was and is during our lifetimes. Why? Because we are
“the Lord’s”, because we were “added to the Lord” through baptism
(Acts 2:41,47; 5:14; 11:24), because we are true brothers-in-Christ.
From God’s perspective, the dead believers are cheering us on as we
run the race to the end; He remembers them as they were, and knows
how they would behave if they were alive today, looking down upon
us as we run the race (Heb. 12:1).
Or in another figure, the blood of the dead believers cries out from
under the altar, demanding vengeance on this world: on the Catholic,
Protestant, Babylonian, Roman, Nazi, Soviet systems that slew them
for their faith (Rev. 6:9). To God, their blood is a voice, just as
real as the voice of Abel, which cried out (in a figure) for judgment
against Cain (Gen. 4:10). After their death, those who had already
died are spoken of as being given “white robes” and being told to
rest a bit longer (Rev. 6:11). Yet the white robe is given at baptism;
a man may cast off Christ, but the prodigal is given again the robe
if he returns (Lk. 15:22 s.w.); we are given white robes in this life
through our acceptance of the blood of Christ and living in response
to that redemption (Rev. 7:13,14; 22:14 Gk.). God giving believers
white robes after their death can surely only be understood as His
remembrance of how in their lives they had put on those robes. But
His view of time is different, and He sees them as doing it again
and again, as He considers how they had died for His cause and how
thereby He will surely raise them. This is just as we would relive
in our own minds the baptism of one of our children who has died.
We know of course that there is no immortal soul, and that we personally
feel nothing in death. But there is an immortal spirit, in that who
we essentially are, our personality, lives on in the memory of a loving
Father.
In the end…
In the end, we are all only ordinary men, nothing-special women,
who have somehow been called by Almighty God to know the ultimately
true faith, to have the hope of eternity with Him- life with His nature,
with His Son, for ever and ever and ever... And yet we can treat this
relationship, this essential being, as just something ordinary.
We can fail to grasp the wonder of grace, fail to have grace ruling
as a king in our hearts and lives, dominating everything (Rom. 5:21);
fail to accept that through such grace, “where the spirit of the Lord
is, there the heart is free” (2 Cor. 3:17). For those brought up in
the faith, it can just be an unthinking following of the faith of
our fathers. Or just a church to attend which we got to know from
our work colleague, our distant relative, because it seemed like the
logical way at the time. Or just...mere religion, with its traditions
and simple ceremonies of baptism and breaking of bread, with its meetings,
with its psychology of religious feeling just like anything else.
Brethren, this ought not so to be for us. This is the Truth, and the
things we stand for stretch on into the spectre of utter infinity;
they are the one and only Truth for our whole and eternal existence.
It isn’t just a crutch to help us through this life, which is all
the religion of this world amounts to. It isn’t mere Christianity,
a badge to wear just as everyone else says ‘I’m a Catholic...a Hindu...a
Baptist’. It’s infinitely and essentially more than that; so much
much more.
Notes
(1) David Levin, Legalism And
Faith (Tidings, 2001).
(2) Gal. 2:20 and 1 Cor. 15:10 show
Paul using the phrase “yet not I but....” to differentiate between
his natural and spiritual self. Perhaps he does the same in the only
other occurrence of the phrase, in 1 Cor 7:10: “And unto the married
I command, yet not I [the natural Paul], but the Lord [the
man Christ Jesus in the spiritual Paul], Let not the wife depart from
her husband”.
(3) Another example would be Heb.
12:8: “Jesus Christ the same yesterday, to day, and for ever”. Paul
saw the three elements of the Yahweh Name supremely manifest in the
Lord Jesus. Which is surely why ‘Jesus’ in the NT becomes the Name
above every Name (Phil. 2:9,10; Eph. 1:21); for only ‘Yahweh’ was
exalted above every other name (Neh. 9:5; Ps. 148:13). John’s Gospel
points out how the Lord often changed tenses so strangely- to the
extent that many have concluded that some of the strange combinations
of tenses are a result of John’s later editing. But it could be that
the Lord used past, present and future tenses in close proximity in
order to show His manifestation of the Name. He is the bread which
was, is and will be on the cross. He came, is coming down, and will
come (Jn. 6:50,51). The hour was coming and yet “now is” (Jn. 4:23;
5:25; 16:31,32). These mixing of tenses must have seemed strange to
the hearers, and they read strangely in the tense-conscious Greek
language. About 50 times in John’s Gospel we read the phrase
“I am” as having been on the lips of Jesus. And it gets more and more
frequent as He nears the cross, as if He was aware of an ongoing manifestation
of the Name which reached its climax there. Or take Jn. 3:13: “No
man hath ascended up to heaven, but he that came down from heaven,
even the son of man which is in heaven”. This man Jesus standing before
them was saying [in figurative terms] that He was in Heaven, had been
in Heaven, had ascended there. Surely His abrupt shift of tenses and
places is to suggest the Yahweh Name being manifested in Him. The
language of ‘coming down’ is classically used in the OT in the context
of Yahweh manifestation in theophany; yet it often occurs in Acts
in the context of the preaching of the Gospel, as if our witness is
a manifestation of the Name (Acts 8:5; 10:21; 12:19; 14:25; 18:22;
25:6).
|