20-18 The Real Cross: Today Is Friday
The idea that the Lord Jesus ended the Law of Moses on the cross needs
some reflection. That statement only pushes the question back one stage
further- how exactly did He ‘end’ the Law there? How did a man dying on
a cross actually end the Law? The Lord Jesus, supremely in His death,
was “the end of the law” (Rom. 10:4). But the Greek telos [“end”]
is elsewhere translated “the goal” (1 Tim. 1:5 NIV). The character and
person of the Lord Jesus at the end was the goal of the Mosaic law; those
613 commandments, if perfectly obeyed, were intended to give rise to a
personality like that of the Lord Jesus. When He reached the climax of
His personal development and spirituality, in the moment of His death,
the Law was “fulfilled”. He taught that He “came” in order to die; and
yet He also “came” in order to “fulfil” the Law (Mt. 5:17).
The sheer and utter reality of the crucifixion needs to be meditated
upon just as much as the actual reality of the fact that Jesus actually
existed. A Psalm foretold that Jesus at His death would be the song
of the drunkards. Many Nazi exterminators took to drink. And it
would seem almost inevitable that the soldiers who crucified Jesus
went out drinking afterwards. Ernest Hemingway wrote a chilling
fictional story of how those men went into a tavern late on that
Friday evening. After drunkenly debating whether “Today is Friday”,
they decide that it really is Friday, and then tell how they nailed
Him and lifted Him up. ''When the weight starts to pull on
'em, that's when it gets em... Ain't I seen 'em ? I seen plenty
of 'em . I tell you, he was pretty good today" . And
that last phrase runs like a refrain through their drunken evening(1).
Whether or not this is an accurate reconstruction isn't my point-
we have a serious duty to seek to imagine what it might have been
like. Both Nazi and Soviet executioners admit how vital it was to
never look the man you were murdering in the face. It was why they
put on a roughness which covered their real personalities. And the
Lord’s executioners would have done the same. To look into His face,
especially His eyes, dark with love and grief for His people, would
have driven those men to either suicide or conversion. I imagine
them stealing a look at His face, the face of this man who didn’t
struggle with them but willingly laid Himself down on the wood.
The cross struck an educated Greek as barbaric folly, a Roman citizen
as sheer disgrace, and a Jew as God's curse. Yet Jesus turned
the sign of disgrace into a sign of victory. Through it, He announced
a radical revaluation of all values. He made it a symbol for a brave
life, without fear even in the face of fatal risks; through struggle,
suffering, death, in firm trust and hope in the goal of true freedom,
life, humanity, eternal life. The offence, the sheer scandal, was
turned into an amazing experience of salvation, the way of the cross
into a possible way of life.
The risen Christ was and is just as much a living reality. Suetonius
records that Claudius expelled Jewish Christians from Rome because they
were agitated by one Chrestus; i.e. Jesus the Christ. Yet the historian
speaks as if He was actually alive and actively present in person . In
essence, He was. All the volumes of confused theology, the senseless theories
about the Trinity. would all have been avoided if only men had had the
faith to believe that the man Jesus who really died and rose, both never
sinned and was also indeed the Son of God. And that His achievement of
perfection in human flesh was real. Yes it takes faith- and all the wrong
theology was only an excuse for a lack of such faith.
It is in our reflections upon the cross that we see revealed the real
nature and quality of our relationship with the Lord Jesus. When we survey
the wondrous cross… there ought to be that sense of wonder, of love for
Him, of conviction of our personal sins, and also conviction of the reality
of His forgiveness. As we survey that wondrous cross, all commentary is
bathos. It’s like trying to describe the Ninth Symphony in words. It is
so much easier, so less challenging, to respond to the cross by seeking
to describe it in the words of atonement theory. All the ink pointlessly
spilt in this area is indicative of this; there seems an obsession with
‘the doctrine of the atonement’. But the essential response to the cross
is not any commentary in words; for as I’ve said, grasping it for what
it is convicts us that all commentary is bathos. Not words, not theories
of explanation, but feelings, belief deep in the heart, challenge to our
habits and traits of character, real, actual, concrete and practical change,
a transformation that is empowered by the Man hanging there.
Notes
(1) " Today is Friday'' in
The Short Stories Of Ernest Hemingway (New York: Scribners,
1954), p. 357. |