16-5-3 House Meetings In The First Century
It would be wrong to get the impression from the early days in Jerusalem
that most Christian converts in the first century were won by mass meetings
and big evangelists like Peter. There is every reason to think that what
happened there was unique. It would have been almost impossible to hold
such mass meetings in the Roman empire. And there is no archaeological
evidence for the existence of any buildings for Christian meetings until
well into the 2nd century. It follows that the massive growth of Christianity
in the 1st century was mainly through personal witness and small house
groups. The Acts record is very abbreviated. Surely we are to see in groups
like that based around Lydia an example of typical first century groups
of believers. The impression we get from the record is that this was the
usual style of Christian meeting. The Gospel was preached from homes,
such as Jason’s in Thessalonica (Acts 17:5), that of Titus Justus and
Stephanas in Corinth (18:7; 1 Cor. 1:16; 16:15), Philip’s in Caesarea
(21:8), Lydia’s and the jailer’s in Philippi (16:15,32-34), the home owned
by the mother of John Mark in Jerusalem (1:13; 12:12). The spread of the
Gospel from homes is therefore a major theme of the record; and the obvious
implication is that the audience was the friends and family of the convert,
to whom they had personally witnessed. There are many stories recorded
of the gradual infiltration of the middle and upper classes of Roman society
by Christianity, on account of the lives and words of slaves. This was
quite against the norm of society, where the master of the house controlled
the religion of the household, including that of the slaves. But such
was the insistent power of personal witness that society was turned on
its head. |